Uber’s Kalanick Should Lose His Board Seat, for the Good of Tech

营销策划 2017-08-11

A newly filed lawsuit shows how much animosity has grown between Uber investors and Travis Kalanick -- and it was already enough toforce him out as CEO. Benchmark Capital, a major investor, filed its complaint yesterday in Delaware Chancery Court, seeking to get the company co-founder kicked off the board.

It's an ugly battle and hardly one-sided. Kalanick reportedly is trying to orchestrate a come-back
in which he would again become CEO. By the way, as chief executive he presided over what may be the longest stretch of corporate culture disasters ever seen in high tech, and that's saying a lot.

Over the decades, venture capital firms have been a mixed blessing for high tech, enabling great successes but also distorting and warping the industry. However, in this case, a win for Benchmark would be good for all. The trend of founder as uncontested ruler has gone too far and it's time to return to some balance of power.

When Dan Primack at Axios broke the story of the suit
yesterday, he noted that one paragraph seemed to encapsulate Benchmark's concerns:

Kalanick, the former CEO of Uber, to entrench himself on Uber's Board of Directors and increase his power over Uber for his own selfish ends. Kalanick's overarching objective is to pack Uber's Board with loyal allies in an effort to insulate his prior conduct from scrutiny and clear the path for his eventual return as CEO--all to the detriment of Uber's stockholders, employees, driver-partners, and customers.

Compare that paragraph with this one from Recode's Theodore Schleifer:

One of tech's most prestigious venture capital firms is publicly and legally pummeling the former CEO of its own portfolio company with 38 pages of gnarly allegations. Six years ago, Benchmark adored Kalanick enough to give him millions of dollars. Now, it despises him enough to initiate a lawsuit that is sure to inflame tensions at a company with a $70 billion valuation that is a cornerstone of Benchmark's financial future.

It all comes down to an unfortunate trend that occurred in high tech. The typical pattern for companies accepting funding once was the trade of equity and influence. Investors wanted a healthy say, if not actual control, of a company when they put in millions of dollars -- collectively billions in the case of Uber.

The imperial founder

About 20 years ago, when a lot of investment money was seeking the best of opportunities for high growth and potential value, founders of the hottest tech companies realized they had a negotiating advantage. They could offer equity and still demand complete control over the company to run as they saw fit. Investors bent their knees and pledged fealty to their economic lords.

I think Google was the first example, where the "triumvirate" of Sergey Brin, Larry Page, and Eric Schmidt used multiple stock classes to keep voting control even as investors lined up for a piece of the action. Facebook is similarly structured and Mark Zuckerberg could get away with it because, again, investors so badly wanted a piece of the pie.

If you want to be an autocrat, that's fine. Go do it on your own money. Build the business over time. But when you're playing with the cash of others, they should have a say when you're doing something that seems dumb. Uber is a perfect example. The company needs to grow up and Kalanick's history suggests that he's not the one who can accomplish it.

But, as Primack reported, Kalanick apparently tried to enlarge the board with personal choices to tighten his control. In fact, when he was out as CEO and, therefore, a board member, he used one of his appointments to put himself back on. Benchmark had agreed to Kalanick's demands for a larger board, but now claims that the long litany of screw-ups and fundamental cultural problems were material information hidden from them at the time. They also alleged Kalanick, as part of leaving as CEO, agreed to make the positions subject to approval by the entire board. In other words, they say he committed fraud.

Even if Benchmark is not successful, this will hopefully send a signal to founders that they cannot treat investors as a disposable resource, taking money and then freezing them out. The underlying assumptions by founders that they alone know what should be done and are never wrong are corrosive and need to end.

您可能感兴趣的

居然能被Uber、滴滴相中,Phantom Auto在自动驾驶上到底有哪两把刷子?... Phantom Auto(左)已与瑞典新创公司 Einride(右)达成合作 雷锋网按:在半年内声名鹊起的新创公司到底厉害在哪? 6 个月前,Phantom Auto 还只不过是自动驾驶新创公司的“小鱼小虾”,它只能时不时扑腾两下以博取投资者的注意。不过现在,Phantom ...
How the Amazon-Whole Foods deal may stock your ref... Mike Segar | Reuters Amazon President, Chairman and CEO Jeff Bezos. Amazon's acquisition of specialty grocerWhole Foods i...
点燃生活的希望灯火:京东招工扶贫安置数万就业... 原标题:点燃生活的希望灯火:京东招工扶贫安置数万就业 “以前我在外地的服装厂上班,但孩子上学很不方便,待遇不高,很难维持生活。自从加入了京东,现在我一个月能挣四五千元,生活大大改善啦!”胡官玲,京东物流陕南配送部安康宁陕站配送员。她的家乡在陕西宁陕县的农村,2016年5月的一天,她在村里听到大喇...
玩转“银发族”生意有点儿难 如今各个创业领域已纷纷被嗅觉敏锐的创业者攻占,母婴、学生、白领……几乎所有细分人群市场都被创业者们插上了小红旗。然而,待开发“白地”——老年人市场,至今仍未出现能扛大旗的“王者”。 近期,曾红极一时的广场舞APP大多已经转型或停摆,广场舞大妈们还在,可赚她们的钱越来越难。去年赶上直播潮流的老年人...
入学通过率不到5%,来自滴滴、卫龙辣条、脉脉的他们都是顶创者!... 湖畔大学被称作是中国商界的“黄埔军校”,因为他们的校长是阿里巴巴马云,教授课程的都是企业大佬级别的人物,他们在行业中具有一定的地位,企业也十分成功,只有通过学习他们的经验才能更好的去创业。马云认为,具有如此实力的湖畔大学,选择来就是你的 新一期的湖畔大学从报名的2000名学员中挑选出48人,通过...