Medium Subscriptions

营销策划 2017-04-20 阅读原文

It’s appears to have been an interesting few months at Medium HQ. First they lay off a significant chunk of the team
. Then they pitch their vision for content on the web
(advertising is bad). Finally, they launch a membership service
, offering premium content and and a handful of member only features.

And, of course, a promise to pay the writers who use the platform. Or, some of them.

It’s an interesting about face, moving away from ads & sponsorships to a pay-for-content service. The entire concept has some merit (and has been tried by other services). But if the NYT struggles to get enough paying subscribers, I’m skeptical that Medium will fare better.

So of course I had to sign up and see what they’re doing.

After a couple of weeks, my skepticism remains. There are several reasons that cause me to doubt the viability of this platform.

First, there is the issue of quality
. While I like the idea of an affordable membership paying for the work of writers I enjoy, I have yet to see the quality reflected in the members only content. Perhaps time will see this improve, but there is a lot of fluff content on Medium. This was true before the membership plan, but it has not shown much improvement.

And so distribution
is an issue as well. I have also enjoyed some great content on Medium (my Items of Note over the past year are comprised of about 50% Medium content). But I have no idea if my membership fee supports those people. I suspect not, as many of them are not full time writers. They have full time gigs and writing is just a part of their online activity & persona.

I would love to simply support these people. But $5 per month to my 20 favourite online writers gets a bit spendy. This is why I like the concept of micro-financing and what Medium is trying to do. If I could direct where some of the funds go to, this would be a win win situation.

Last, there is still the question of ownership
. I continue to believe Medium only works as a social network, a place to syndicate my writing that primarily lives in a location where I am in full control. Premium, member only content only makes the ownership issue more of a problem. If an article I write on Medium is shared with members and I am paid for it, do I have the freedom to post that article on my blog, where it’s available to the world for no cost?

I have no conclusion to share here. But the changes are interesting and I’m very curious to see what the next couple of years have in store for this platform.

&

chrisbowler

责编内容by:chrisbowler阅读原文】。感谢您的支持!

您可能感兴趣的

大道用车李哲:用户体验提升才是共享汽车运营的核心... 近年来,继共享单车后,共享汽车如雨后春笋般在各大城市崛起。据资料显示,2017年共享汽车行业融资总额达到764. 59 亿元,2018年汽车共享出行潜在市场容量有望达到1. 8万亿元。在全国范围内,陆续有创业者进入市场,其中也陆续有企业走向倒闭。 共享汽车的发展潜力也赢得了资本市...
人工智能时代的深度学习,最值得关注的五家创业公司... 深度学习技术在2015年取得了突破性的进步,与深度学习相关的开源、收购和创业消息更是不绝于耳。与大数据和SDN热潮类似,虽然谷歌、微软和Facebook等巨头都将深度学习作为研发重点,但是真正能够引领深度学习创新潮流的往往会是一些创业公司。以下是Venturebeat推荐值得关注的五家深度...
汤晓鸥谈人工智能创业:只有痛没有快乐 先要活... 网易科技讯9月8日消息,汤晓鸥对人工智能现在的发展谈了自己的看法。他认为,人工智能目前视觉计算是主战场,但对自然语言的理解人类还完全没有解决,人工智能做到科幻的程度非常难。 人工智能做到科幻程度非常难 神经科学专家饶毅对人工智能取代人的说法认为是不可能实现的,至少在有生之年是不能实现...
Google是否投资你,得看AI支持不支持 如果你的机构还在按部就班地搞“过会”那一套,或许GV内部机制会给你醒目一击。 GV,全称Google Ventures,Alphabet旗下风险投资资金,2009年正式成立,是首批聘用工程师的VC机构,原先主要为了配合Google战略协同,但其后角色越来越独立。 在外界都以为招工程师是走技术...
ChinaBang Awards 2018 盛况回顾:发现中国创新的力量 !... 2011 年,动点科技 TechNode 首次发起了 ChinaBang Awards 年度评选活动,致力于关注和发掘中国的创业创新,力求打造最开放、最具独立精神的年度评选。 从北京到成都,从常州到上海,一直以来,ChinaBang Awards 始终奉行“发现中国创新的力量”,发现了...