存储架构

Moving to Serverless for Azure SQL DB

微信扫一扫,分享到朋友圈

Moving to Serverless for Azure SQL DB
0

After the announcement of Serveless Azure SQL Datbase at //build/, I decided to give it a try. I have some Basic databases, so what would Serverless mean for me? I was wondering as the Basic dbs are cheap and moving to Serverless means moving to Gen 5, larger machines.

Let’s try this.

Reconfigure an Existing Database

I’ll pick one of the basic test databases I have and look for the sizing. It’s under Configure, which is where my mouse it in the image below.

Here’s my database config and cost. For my little dev/test environment, this makes perfect sense. I’m paying $4.99 a month in virtual cost. Since I get $150/month as part of my subscription as an MVP, I can afford to put up 5 or 6 of these test databases for different things without worry.

After I click the vCore pricing, I get new options. I can see Serverless in here.

For dev/test (for me), that’s a lot. I don’t want this kind of bill every month.

Let’s change to serverless.

That cost changes

That’s more affordable. I think that’s worth trying.

The last thing to set is the Auto-pause delay. This is the amount of inactive time that we set before the db shuts down. We don’t want this shutting down after a few seconds of inactivity, presumably because there is overhead to shutting down and restarting. I’d expect that most people would want tens of minutes or hours before stopping.

I hope so, because when you scroll down, you see this:

However, that’s the minimum you can set.

Six hours seems crazy, but still, it’s better than nothing. I hope this changes after the preview period to something more like 1 hour. Perhaps this is to gather additional telemetry during preview, but we’ll see.

I click “Apply” and see this:

If I go back to the overview, I see one of the cool things about Azure.

I can still use the system as I’m making changes. That’s not normally what happens with IaaS or my own systems.

Is It Worth it?

We’ll see. I’ll check the bill next month, while making it a point to access this database and do some work. I’m guessing my bill will go down, which is good, but I’d also expect that this database will perform better than my previous one because it’s much larger.

This is an interesting idea, but we’ll see how it goes.

阅读原文...


微信扫一扫,分享到朋友圈

Moving to Serverless for Azure SQL DB
0

Voice of the DBA

VMWare acquires Bitnami to bolster its app packaging tools

上一篇

D3.js 弦生成器(V3版本)

下一篇

评论已经被关闭。

插入图片

热门分类

往期推荐

Moving to Serverless for Azure SQL DB

长按储存图像,分享给朋友