Supreme Court will weigh letting states collect tax on ecommerce sales

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., a challenge to a decades-old ruling that has exempted sales by ecommerce companies from collecting state and local sales tax, reports
Bloomberg
.

That old ruling, 1992’s Quill Corp. v. North Dakota
, established a lasting precedent that states could tax only sales by businesses that reside within the state’s borders. Even though the case concerned a mail order company, the decision has been used by internet companies to avoid collecting state and local sales tax.

Critics of the 1992 decision say it no longer fits a world where much of our commerce happens, at least in part, online.The Government Accountability Office estimates that, had they been allowed, states and local governments could have collected as much as $13 billion in additional taxes on online sales.

The online retailers Wayfair, Overstock.com, and Newegg will be lining up against the state of South Dakota in the High Court. Amazon, which isn’t directly involved in the case, already collects state sales tax on products it sells under its own brand,
but it could be forced to require that all third-party sellers collect sales tax, too.MS

Fast Company责编内容来自:Fast Company (源链) | 更多关于

阅读提示:酷辣虫无法对本内容的真实性提供任何保证,请自行验证并承担相关的风险与后果!
本站遵循[CC BY-NC-SA 4.0]。如您有版权、意见投诉等问题,请通过eMail联系我们处理。
酷辣虫 » 科技动态 » Supreme Court will weigh letting states collect tax on ecommerce sales

喜欢 (0)or分享给?

专业 x 专注 x 聚合 x 分享 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

使用声明 | 英豪名录