3 case studies of duplicate content consolidation

It’s commonly held that duplicate or substantially similar content is bad for SEO. When Google finds duplicate content, this creates a conflict for the algorithm. Essentially, Google gets confused as to which page should be the primary ranking URL for a given search query, so it chooses the one it believes to be the most relevant. Unfortunately, the URL it chooses may not be the one you wish to display — and, in cases of exact duplicate content, the other versions of the page may even be filtered out of search results .

The best way to fix this issue is to consolidate the duplicate/similar content’s ranking signals into a singular version of the page. In practice, this is usually done by implementing either a 301 redirect, canonical or “noindex” tag.

While many of us know this to be true, it can often be helpful to see examples of the different types of duplicate content that exist in the wild and how to best handle them. To better help you find and fix duplicate/similar content, I’ve provided case studies for three different instances where we consolidated these types of pages and noted the results we saw.

1. Consolidating exact duplicate pages

The simplest type of duplicate content issue you may encounter is a straightforward duplicate page. This page will contain the exact same content as another page on the website. For one of our clients that advertises franchise listings, we found two pages that contained the exact same content targeted towards “low-cost franchises.” You can see that the two pages were identical here:

Because there was no need for both of these pages, we suggested that our client 301 redirect one of them to the other page. Personally, I love using 301 redirects if possible because it points both users and link equity to a single URL. It tends to send a stronger signal than the other consolidation methods. Almost immediately, we saw rankings and traffic to the original page spike.

Since the 301 redirect was implemented, organic traffic improved by over 200 percent to the page, and it is now consistently one of the top three pages on the site each month.

How did we decide which page to 301 redirect? To do this, we took a look at three different factors:

  1. Which page the site internally linked to the most.
  2. Which page was currently ranking the best.
  3. Which page had the most organic traffic historically.

The final destination page we selected had the most internal links and traffic and was also ranking ahead of the other. I would definitely urge you to look at these three factors when deciding which page to consolidate your duplicate pages to.

2. Consolidating semantically similar pages

As Google gets better and better at understanding semantically related topics, the search engine is starting to return more results that contain topics outside of the initial query. For instance, in a search for “braces near me,” I see a lot of results for orthodontists, even though the term “orthodontist” wasn’t in my original search. Google is most likely doing this type of consolidation for some of your core keywords, and you should be aware of what it’s grouping together.

The client mentioned above has done a good job of building out landing pages that target different industry options (Auto Franchises, Cleaning Franchises and so on). This included the following two pages: Food Franchises and Fast Food Franchises.

At first glance, it might seem obvious that searches for these two terms might yield different results. However, we were seeing that Google was treating these terms somewhat interchangeably:

It appeared that Google had collected enough user data to determine that searchers wanted similar results for these two queries. Because neither of their pages were ranking well at the time, and they both contained very similar content, we recommended that they consolidate the ranking signals.

Our client still wanted users to be able to access both pages, so we recommended they implement a canonical tag instead of a 301 redirect. They added the canonical tag on the “Fast Food” page that pointed to the “Food” page because the latter gave users a list of all the franchises under both categories.

Once again, the results were pretty convincing:

Organic traffic to the page has improved by 47 percent since implementation. This shows us that it’s important to not only consolidate pages where standard keyword targeting and content overlap, but also where there might be conflict with other semantically related pages.

3. Consolidating URL parameters

Last but certainly not least is looking for URL parameters that Google may be finding and assessing as duplicates of other pages. While it’s not always the case, often URLs with parameters appended to them will contain duplicate or very similar content to the source page.

This was certainly the situation for another one of our clients. We found that many of their key pages were generating a large number of URLs with different parameters. While these pages did contain slightly different content, to the search engines they appeared to be largely the same.

We solved this issue by using a canonical tag. We instructed the client to dynamically implement canonical tags that would reference the primary landing pages that Google should be ranking. As Google slowly removed these URL parameters from the index, we began to see a large shift in rankings.

Organic traffic followed suit, and the website now generates over 800 percent more than our baseline levels.

While we have been working on many other aspects of the site, there’s no doubt in my mind that this was a major factor in the ranking and traffic increases we’ve seen.

Finding consolidation opportunities

All of this begs the question: How do you find instances of duplicate or similar content that can be consolidated?

While there are many different tools out there that can help you with this, I’ve found no substitute to looking manually. When evaluating if duplicate/similar content is a potential problem, I start with a “site:” search of that domain followed by their core keywords. If I see pages with similar meta data in Google’s index, this is a red flag that they may be duplicates:

I repeat this process for as many keywords as necessary until I have a good understanding of the problem.

I highly recommend researching duplicate content issues manually to completely understand the nature of the problem and the best way to address it. Doing so can lead to massive improvements for the organic search performance of an individual page, or even an entire website.

Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land. Staff authors are listedhere.

您可能感兴趣的

技术转型记----售前解决方案 很久没有写日志了,看看曾经的文字。有过一些鸡汤,也有过一些干货。但鸡汤的功力不深,被人一眼就能看出来。而干货又太过于干了,对于想学技术的人来说,又有些难了。转型后,总是会面对不同的客户,有的是大牛。有的只是懂个皮毛,但是学的又很多,而很广。在与客户的接触中,发现,纯技术思维是有一定缺陷的。如何从一个...
新世代的搜尋引擎,認識 Google 演算法:Rank Brain... 早在 2015年的年底,知名 SEO媒體就曾 證實 ,Google 的搜尋引擎內有一個新的演算法在運作,這個演算法叫做"RankBrain",RankBrain 是Google所開發出來、負責機器學習的 A.I.。現在過了一年半載,究竟這個搜尋引擎如何運作、他如何影響 SEO,還是有許多人不清楚…...
科技驱动保险业发展,保险科技应该把握哪些机遇?... 快速发展的技术正从三个方面对保险行业施压: 1、新的客户需求 首先是客户,客户已经习惯了科技公司(如阿里和腾讯)为他们带来的优质服务和个性化的体验。而目前大部分传统保险产品同质化现象还很普遍,缺乏个性化产品和服务来满足客户的新需求。不过在保险科技领域,UBI车险有潜力成为第一...
推荐一本神奇的脑神经学著作《重塑大脑》... 本文首发于微信公众号【麦青杂文铺】(ID:mqzwp2015),已获得转载授权,如要转载须直接联系原公号。 作者:麦青Mandy,北大才女,资深的品牌营销专家,历经世界500强外企与私企,现SEED UNITED互联网营销公司合伙人。公众号只分享最真实、理性、逗比的职场、营销、人生经验。 ...
我国物探船“海洋石油721”首次完成赤道作业... 央视网消息:中国海洋石油总公司今天(7月15日)宣布,我国最先进的深水物探船队,首次完成了西非赤道海域三维地震勘探作业,填补了我国在赤道零纬度海域作业的空白。此次作业工区位于西非加蓬,作业项目面积超过10000平方公里,是我国海洋石油物探史上首个单一作业面积过万的海洋三维地震勘探项目。 ...
Search Engine Land责编内容来自:Search Engine Land (源链) | 更多关于

阅读提示:酷辣虫无法对本内容的真实性提供任何保证,请自行验证并承担相关的风险与后果!
本站遵循[CC BY-NC-SA 4.0]。如您有版权、意见投诉等问题,请通过eMail联系我们处理。
酷辣虫 » 3 case studies of duplicate content consolidation



专业 x 专注 x 聚合 x 分享 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

使用声明 | 英豪名录