Golden Open Access for the ACM: Who Should Pay?

综合技术 2017-01-06

In a move that I greatly support, the ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN), is exploring various ways to adopt a truly Golden Open Access model, by rolling out a survey asking your opinion, set up by Michael Hicks . Even though I myself am most active in ACM’s Special Interest Group on Software Engineering SIGSOFT, I do publish at and attend SIGPLAN conferences such as OOPSLA. And I sincerely hope that SIGSOFT will follow SIGPLAN’s leadership in this important issue.

ACM presently supportsgreen open access (self-archiving) and a concept called “Open TOC” in which papers are accessible via a dedicated “Table of Contents” page for a particular conference. While better than nothing, I agree with OOPSLA 2017 program chair Jonathan Aldrich who explains in his blog post thatGolden Open Access is much preferred.

This does, however, raise the question who should pay for making publications open access, which is part of the SIGPLAN survey:

  • Attendants Pay: Increase the conference fees: SIGPLAN estimates that this would amount to an increase by around $50,- per attendee.
  • Authors Pay:Introduce Article Processing Charges: SIGPLAN indicates that if a full conference goes open access this would presently amount to $400 per paper.

Note that the math here suggest that the number of registrants is around 8 times the number of papers in the main research track. Also note that it assumes that only papers in the main research track are made open access. A conference like ICSE, however, has many workshops with many papers: It is equally important that these become open access too, which would change the math considerably.

The article processing charges of $400,- are presented as a given: They may seem in line with what commercial publishers charge, but they are certainly very high compared to what, e.g. LIPIcs charges for ECOOP (which is less than $100). These costs of $400,- come from ACM’s desire (need) to continue to make a substantial profit from their publishing activities, and should go down.

In his blog post, Jonathan Aldrich argues for the “author pays” model. His reasoning is that this can be viewed as a “funder pays” model: Most authors are funded by research grants, and usually in those grants funds can be found to cater for the costs involved in publishing open access.

On this point (and this point alone) I disagree with Jonathan. To me it feels fundamentally wrong to punish authors by making them pay $400 more for their registration. If anything, they should get a reduction for delivering the content of the conference.

I see Jonathan’s point that some funding agencies are willing to cover open access costs (e.g. NSF, NWO, H2020), and that it is worthwhile to explore how to tap into that money. But this requires data on what percentage of papers could be labeled as “funded”. For my department, I foresee several cases where it would be the department who’d have to pay for this instead of an external agency.

I do sympathize with Jonathan’s appeal to reduce conference registration costs, which can be very high. But the cost of making publications open access should be borne by the full community (all attendants), not just by those who happen to publish a paper.

Shining examples of open access computer science conferences are the Usenix , AAAI , and NIPS events. Full golden open access of all content, and no extra charges for authors — these conferences are years ahead of the ACM.

Do you have an opinion on “author pays” versus “participant pays”? Fill in the survey !

Thank you SIGPLAN for initiating this discussion!

责编内容by:Arie van Deursen (源链)。感谢您的支持!


ACM SIGKDD主席裴健专访:华人学者在数据挖掘领域的成就有目共睹... 雷锋网 (公众号:雷锋网) AI科技评论按:近年来,越来越多的国人站上了世界舞台,不管是在学术界,还是在工业界,我们看到一股越来越强大的中华力量。 近日,加拿大西蒙弗雷泽大学计算机学院裴健教授...
如何用ACM简化你的Spring Cloud微服务环境配置管理... 配置的环境属性 毫无疑问,在系统持续交付的过程中,系统最终运行环境的多样性及复杂性毫无疑问增加了我们在配置管理工作上的负担,有时候,甚至不夸张的说,配置就是因环境而生. 这在Eugen Pa...
2015 ACM/ICPC 沈阳赛区现场赛解题报告汇总... 欢迎转载,转载请注明出处。 针对2015 ACM/ICPC 沈阳赛区现场赛(10月25日),本日志汇总网上ACMer们发布的解题报告,方便大家互相学习。欢迎补充和完善本日志。感谢所...
Vue + Koa 搭建 ACM OJ 花了两个多月时间,我与 lazzzis 完成了第二版本的Putong OJ,因为中间忙着春招以及毕业设计等,项目最近才正式上线。 项目线上地址 ...
MSRA获ACM TOMM 2017最佳论文:让AI接手繁杂专业的图文排版设计工作... 你是否曾经为如何创作和编辑一篇图文并茂、排版精美的文章而烦恼?或是为缺乏艺术灵感和设计思路而痛苦?AI技术能否在艺术设计中帮助到我们?今天我们为大家介绍的这篇论文,“Automatic Generat...