职场创业

    今日:512| 主题:45408
收藏本版
IT、互联网、电子商务创业经验、建议、管理等知识分享。

[其他] ‘Come for the tool, stay for the network’ reconsidered

[复制链接]

立即注册CoLaBug.com会员,免费获得投稿人的专业资料,享用更多功能,玩转个人品牌!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x

‘Come for the tool, stay for the network’ reconsidered-1 (Facebook,software,industry,managing,director)
      Marc Bodnick Crunch Network Contributor
   Marc Bodnick led the business and community teams at Quora from 2011-16. Prior to that, he was a co-founder and managing director of Elevation Partners, where he helped lead the firm's investments in Facebook and Yelp.
   How to join the network     For the past few years, “Come for the tool, stay for the network” has been in vogue as a theory of consumer startup product development. Chris Dixon’s January 2015 post popularized the idea*, and it’s frequently cited in industry discussions and by investors.
  Why does this idea have so much appeal? There are several reasons:
  
       
  • It’s much easier to build a good single-user tool versus a brand-new multi-person network/social product. A software tool with a clear one-user ROI doesn’t need to solve the cold start/chicken-and-egg problem of building a network.   
  • “Come for the tool, stay for the network” gives founders a confident vision of traction and getting to scale. It a compelling rationale for optimism (including for marketing) — “once we get a bunch of engaged people using our single-player tool, we can naturally [somehow] connect them into a network.”   
  • Very few startup founders are good social system designers, so the idea that you can (and in fact should) punt on building your network is reassuring. Work on the hard thing later!  
  But as I’ve spent more time around consumer products, I’ve come to the view that this theory is overstated and over-relied upon by entrepreneurs and investors.
  Many consumer product startups have tried the tool-then-network approach, but it’s difficult to think of any big successes. Building a social product is almost always more challenging than building a great single-player tool, and if your initial product doesn’t include crucial, integrated social functionality, you probably won’t succeed in building a strong network down the road; you’ll either fail altogether, or at best build a weak network.
  Internet system design is extremely difficult; only a handful of founders/teams have pulled it off over the past 10-15 years. Every great consumer social product started as a network with important social functionality included from the start: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Quora, Gmail, Yelp, Wikipedia, Pinterest — social/networking features defined these products from Day 1.
  Building a great network does matter in establishing a sustainable competitive advantage.
  Proponents of the “Come for the tool, stay for the network” theory sometimes indulge in revisionist product history. “Instagram started as a photo filter tool” — wrong; sharing and following was critical from the beginning. “Facebook started as a digital student directory” — wrong; the social friend-to-friend network was key from the start.
  And it’s not just startups that have relied on the tool→network hypothesis. Google (many examples; e.g. Buzz), Apple (Ping) and Dropbox (Carousel) have all tried to build networks after-the-fact, without much success. And Microsoft hasn’t been able to build any consumer network products starting with their massive base of Office and Windows users. So even with a huge number of users who love your software/service, that doesn’t mean you’ll be able to connect them into a network.
   Counter-examples (i.e. where companies have turned good tools into good networks)? There are some, but it’s hard to think of cases where really strong networks were built: Imgur , certain fitness tracking apps, Kindle / Goodreads , Zynga games (the network enables leader boards and trading, but, ultimately, when the game gets old, people stop playing it, despite the network). Also perhaps Medium — it’s a very good blogging tool with a good community; but whether it’s a strong network remains unclear, given the level and value of social interactivity.
     Related Articles

   YouTube gets its own social network with the launch of YouTube Community   Music video app Triller becomes a social network   Photo-sharing app for health professionals, Figure1, adds direct messaging    Many failures and disappointments in consumer interactive technology occur because founders/investors believe that a valuable, scalable network is just a short jump from a great tool.
  And building a great network does matter — a lot — in establishing a sustainable competitive advantage. You could argue that in the modern history of consumer tech products, the only products that have built a defensible advantage without establishing a network were backed by extraordinary institutional knowledge/resources — e.g. Apple’s hardware, Google’s ranking, YouTube’s database of nearly every video ever made post-internet (and even YouTube is coming under nontrivial pressure from Facebook these days), etc. Everything else in consumer technology seems to reduce to perfect competition if the market is valuable enough for anyone to care.
   *Andrew Chen made a similar point in his March 2014 post .
  Featured Image: KTSDESIGN/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Getty Images
友荐云推荐




上一篇:It’s Up to All of Us
下一篇:Why Culture Should be a Pillar of Your Business Strategy
酷辣虫提示酷辣虫禁止发表任何与中华人民共和国法律有抵触的内容!所有内容由用户发布,并不代表酷辣虫的观点,酷辣虫无法对用户发布内容真实性提供任何的保证,请自行验证并承担风险与后果。如您有版权、违规等问题,请通过"联系我们"或"违规举报"告知我们处理。

yh7jt 发表于 5 天前
高手云集 果断围观
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

不能墨迹 发表于 5 天前
欢乐,不颂~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

翠曼 发表于 5 天前
记得回帖!!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

司机激励 发表于 5 天前
一粒盐,发了脾气就是海。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

54654 发表于 5 天前
众里寻他千百度,蓦然回首在这里!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

snail-feng 发表于 5 天前
每天顶顶贴,一身轻松啊!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

江瑶 发表于 3 天前
鸡蛋从外打破,是食物;从内打破,是生命。人生,从外打破,是压力;从内打破,是成长。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

梦琪 发表于 前天 01:06
如果我做了皇帝,就封你当太子!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

ooxfb 发表于 前天 04:44
我对楼主的敬仰如滔滔江水,绵延不绝!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

*滑动验证:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

我要投稿

推荐阅读

扫码访问 @iTTTTT瑞翔 的微博
回页顶回复上一篇下一篇回列表手机版
手机版/CoLaBug.com ( 粤ICP备05003221号 | 文网文[2010]257号 )|网站地图 酷辣虫

© 2001-2016 Comsenz Inc. Design: Dean. DiscuzFans.

返回顶部 返回列表