职场创业

    今日:121| 主题:45617
收藏本版
IT、互联网、电子商务创业经验、建议、管理等知识分享。

[其他] Due diligence is a responsibility for investors, an opportunity for startups

[复制链接]
泡沫的爱 发表于 2016-10-5 05:11:11
227 10

立即注册CoLaBug.com会员,免费获得投稿人的专业资料,享用更多功能,玩转个人品牌!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x

Due diligence is a responsibility for investors, an opportunity for startups-1 (500startups,startups,500,startups,中国,business,startups,500,startups简介)
      Dr. Nancy Markley Crunch Network Contributor
    Dr. Nancy Markley is president and CEO of MPowrx™ , which in-licenses, researches, develops, manufactures and distributes health and wellness products.
   How to join the network    Many startup companies begin with either an idea or a proprietary technology. Sometimes this technology is straightforward and easily explained; other times, it is novel and revolutionary.
  For some founders, the latter can be a double-edged sword, especially once they begin to seek outside financing. If your technology is new, it can be hard to explain and prove. But if it is potentially disruptive, it can attract significant attention from potential investors.
   The latter is what happened with the disgraced healthcare startupTheranos. Founder Elizabeth Holmes raised massive rounds of financing on the promise of a new way to test blood that would transform medical testing for all of mankind. Investors threw money at Holmes and Theranos , leading to a valuation of $9 billion at a 2014 financing round.
   As the media has recently reported though, it would appear that few of Theranos’ investors had any experience in the medical and biopharma industries. Rather, those with ties to the technology industry came from software backgrounds, and the others were strong political players in the U.S.
  These investors most likely did not perform their due diligence on Theranos and its technology. Because of their backgrounds, it’s possible that they did not even know what to look for. Theranos was known to keep their cards close to their chest, and was secretive about their technology and data.
   Regardless, investors kept coming and giving money to the company. Were they investing without doing their own homework on the technology, instead relying on earlier investors they believed had performed due diligence themselves? In a recent op-ed for Fortune Magazine , marketing professor Kent Grayson explained this phenomenon as trusting “credence goods”:
  For Theranos, these kinds of endorsements were made by a number of high-profile investors, such as software giant, Larry Ellison, and a prestigious board, which included high-profile lawyer, David Boies, and former secretary of state, Henry Kissinger. When well-respected people buy into something, we often assume that they’ve done our homework for us. After all, would they risk their reputation without doing their own due diligence?
  Some excuse Theranos’ secrecy as merely protecting their intellectual property and technology, in addition to desiring confidentiality for their company. Having worked in the biotechnology industry for many years, and having raised capital for a medical products startup, I can say that that argument does not hold water.
  If you don’t trust these people to keep your secrets under a confidentiality agreement, then you shouldn’t be in business with them.
  Founders must be open to the scrutiny of due diligence. If your potential investors are bringing in scientists and experts to audit your company, you must trust them as they analyze your technology and data, especially in the medical sector. There are confidentiality agreements as well as other protections that you can put in place during the due diligence process. If you don’t trust these people to keep your secrets under a confidentiality agreement, then you shouldn’t be in business with them. There’s no reason why you can’t share your data and have it externally validated.
   In Theranos’ case, it’s possible that investors invested in a technology that may ultimately not deliver what was promised. Unfortunately, this scenario does happen. Companies may oversell their technology by overstating its capabilities, or they may fail to pursue rigorous scientific procedure with respect to the efficacy of their technology. Sometimes investors get caught up in the narrative of the company. Theranos, in particular, was a media darling before The Wall Street Journal’s groundbreaking report last year.
   It’s worth noting that, for the most part, well-known investors in the biotechnology and life sciences spaces, especially in Silicon Valley, did not invest in Theranos. Because these investors often have the expertise and the experience in their fields, they knew what to look for. In this case, biotechnology investors thought that Theranos’ technology seemed too good to be true . Even as Theranos continued to raise money and announce new applications of their technology, they remained unwilling to share their data. This was a red flag that told savvy biotechnology investors to stay away.
     Related Articles

   The truth about due diligence    For medical startup companies, being able to share your data (under proper confidentiality agreements), having your technology validated in clinical trials and peer-reviewed in medical journals should be a welcome. It is a good thing to be able to prove the effectiveness of your product. You want to be able to show investors that your product works and has valid applications.
  Founders should always be open to third-party validation. We took the time to have our first product — a medical device for treatment of snoring and sleep apnea — undergo clinical testing and peer review. By the time we took the product to market, and as we raised capital later on, we had data to share that showed that our product was clinically proven and that the technology was scientifically sound.
  At the same time, due diligence is the responsibility of investors. If they don’t perform their due diligence, and they’re simply relying on the credibility or the pedigree of the management team, they risk investing in products or technology that is ultimately proven unsound.
   Featured Image: sergign / Shutterstock
友荐云推荐




上一篇:Millennials May Not Be 'the Entrepreneurs of Today' Everyone Thinks Th
下一篇:The Relentless Pursuit of Excellence: LinkedIn Speaker Series with Golden State
酷辣虫提示酷辣虫禁止发表任何与中华人民共和国法律有抵触的内容!所有内容由用户发布,并不代表酷辣虫的观点,酷辣虫无法对用户发布内容真实性提供任何的保证,请自行验证并承担风险与后果。如您有版权、违规等问题,请通过"联系我们"或"违规举报"告知我们处理。

猫妖 发表于 2016-10-5 07:32:53
我喜欢上学,我只是不喜欢上课。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

漫过云烟 发表于 2016-10-5 08:04:18
顶贴不认真,大脑有问题。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

陈昌达 发表于 2016-10-5 08:18:27
佩服佩服!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

柒小沫 发表于 2016-10-5 08:18:39
鼎力支持!!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

寇鲜 发表于 2016-10-5 08:18:45
看帖要回,回帖才健康,我使劲踩,楼主辛苦了!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

布小明 发表于 2016-10-5 08:38:35
楼主你好。。新人。混眼熟。顺便骗点经验。到手~拍拍屁股走人~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

星纪元 发表于 2016-10-9 02:09:13
月经不仅仅是女人的痛苦,也是男人的痛苦。  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

关系不明不白 发表于 2016-10-23 00:06:24
天灵灵地灵灵,这次一定是沙发!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1468844 发表于 2016-11-6 13:08:37
天空飘过五个字,那都不是事。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

*滑动验证:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

我要投稿

推荐阅读

扫码访问 @iTTTTT瑞翔 的微博
回页顶回复上一篇下一篇回列表手机版
手机版/CoLaBug.com ( 粤ICP备05003221号 | 文网文[2010]257号 )|网站地图 酷辣虫

© 2001-2016 Comsenz Inc. Design: Dean. DiscuzFans.

返回顶部 返回列表