请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版

网络科技

    今日:52| 主题:271679
收藏本版
互联网、科技极客的综合动态。

[其他] Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products

[复制链接]
范德萨 发表于 2016年10月4日 08:43
748 31

立即注册CoLaBug.com会员,免费获得投稿人的专业资料,享用更多功能,玩转个人品牌!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products-1-网络科技-discounted,businesses,Community,customers,products
   Amazon is making a significant change to its Community Guidelines , announced today , which will eliminate any incentivized reviews, except for those that emerge from within its own Amazon Vine program. This program allows Amazon – not the seller or vendor – to identify trusted reviewers, and has a number of controls in place in order to keep bias out of the review process.
   Amazon has historically prohibited compensation for reviews – even going so far as to sue thosebusinesses who pay for fake reviews , as well as the individuals who write them , in an effort to make its review and rating system fairer and more helpful to online shoppers. However, it has allowed businesses to offer products to customers in exchange for their “honest” review.
  The only condition was that those reviewers would have to disclose their affiliation with the business in question in the text of their review. Reviewers were generally offered the product for free or at a discounted price, in exchange for their review.
  Although, in theory, these reviewers could write their true opinion on the product – positive or negative – these incentivized reviews have tended to be overwhelmingly biased in favor of the product being rated.
  This is due to a combination of factors – the fact that the vendor or seller has likely sought out those reviewers who are less critical, and the fact that reviewers may believe they would no longer have the opportunity to receive these sorts of offers, if they chose to say negative things.
   In general, shoppers have begun to distrust these reviews because they believe them to be biased. That’s not just a “feeling,” as it turns out – a recent study of over 7 million reviews indicated that the average rating for products with incentivized reviews was higher than non-incentivized ones. (That is, a 4.74 average rating versus a 4.36 average rating, out of 5 stars).
   

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products-2-网络科技-discounted,businesses,Community,customers,products

  Even with this 0.38 star difference, the impact was substantial – boosting products from the 54th percentile to the 94th percentile. Effectively, incentivized reviews could create top-rated products.
  The study also found that incentivized reviewers were 12 times less likely to give a 1-star rating than non-incentivized reviews, and almost 4 times less likely to leave a critical review in general.
   

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products

Amazon bans incentivized reviews tied to free or discounted products-3-网络科技-discounted,businesses,Community,customers,products

  Technically, these reviewers are not compensated with cash, but writing reviews has become a windfall of sorts. Those who participate in incentivized reviews have written an average of 232 reviews, the study indicated, while those who have not, only wrote an average of 31 reviews. That’s a lot of free and discounted products for these ‘non-compensated’ reviewers!
   Amazon says that, going forward, the only incentivized reviews will be those from Amazon Vine . These don’t work the same way, however. For starters, Amazon selects who will be allowed to review products, and it does so mainly to boost the review count on new or pre-release products that haven’t yet generated enough sales to have a large number of organic reviews.
  Vine reviewers are invited to join the program only after having written a number of reviews voted as “helpful” by other customers, and tend to have expertise in a specific product category.
  “We do not incentivize positive star ratings, attempt to influence the content of reviews, or even require a review to be written,” explains Chee Chew, VP, Customer Experience at Amazon in an announcement about how Vine controls for bias. “And we limit the total number of Vine reviews that we display for each product,” he adds.
  In addition, vendors don’t have any contact with Vine reviewers, nor do they get to influence which reviewers will receive their products, which are submitted directly to Amazon for distribution.
  These changes will apply to all product categories other than books, as Amazon has always allowed advance copies of books to be distributed, the retailer notes. Amazon also says it has other ideas about making Vine more useful in the future, but didn’t go into detail.
  An Amazon spokesperson tells us that reviews that were received prior to the policy change are only being retroactively removed if they are excessive, and don’t comply with prior policy. That means you’ll still see a ton of these seemingly biased reviews live on Amazon, unfortunately. The retailer also says that if it finds anyone is attempting to manipulate reviews by tying reviews to discounted products, it will take action against them, starting today.
  Featured Image: Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto/Getty Images



上一篇:Here are the 61 passwords that powered the Mirai IoT botnet
下一篇:深度丨互联网家装交易平台建设(上)
南国未暖 发表于 2016年10月4日 10:32
楼下的不要小看我,我可不是吃素的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

僅剩的余溫 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:03
我是个哑巴,平时说话都是伪装的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

谢辉 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:03
将薪比薪想一下,算了,不想活了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

黄杰 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:06
逆袭成功。。。。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

黄凯 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:09
为毛老子总也抢不到沙发?!!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

全靠老菩 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:10
加关注!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

心_凡 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:12
我也是坐沙发的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

香蝶 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:16
灌水?挽尊?求粉?不,都不是,香蝶只是过路的
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

何雨佳 发表于 2016年10月4日 11:21
楼主你好。。新人。混眼熟。顺便骗点经验。到手~拍拍屁股走人~
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

*滑动验证:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

我要投稿

推荐阅读


回页顶回复上一篇下一篇回列表
手机版/CoLaBug.com ( 粤ICP备05003221号 | 文网文[2010]257号 )

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc. Design: Dean. DiscuzFans.

返回顶部 返回列表