今日:62| 主题:262090

[科技] How the Slack app ecosystem is helping chatbot developers

无法直视 发表于 2016-10-3 09:48:46
327 12


您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册


How the Slack app ecosystem is helping chatbot developers-1 (Microsoft,companies,valuation,benefits,helping)

  It’s good to be part of theSlack ecosystem.
Our bot MailClark is among 600 third-party apps that work on Slack. I like to say we get all the benefits of a flea on the back of an elephant; the beast moves, eats or grows, and so do we.
  But even that metaphor has its limits. Slack wants us there, and goes out of its way to care for us. Take for instance the $80 million venture fund it formed last year for nothing but apps. Already it spent $2 million funding companies with apps that work on Slack, typically awarding around $100,000 per company.
  Funds like that are old news for larger, more established companies like Microsoft or Google — a way to put fingers in more pots, have an early say in youthful industries or to spice up their hedged assets with a bit of risk. But it’s surprising for a young company like Slack, even with its triple unicorn status. Its funding is still a tiny fraction of its valuation. Why aren’t they spending that money on growing into some of that perceived value, rather than pass it straight through to other apps? What are they doing?
I can’t jump into Stewart Butterfield’s head and pull out the answer. But as a software company, I can tell you that courting developers early is the single best way to keep our added value away from potential competitors.
Here’s an example of how this works (or doesn’t work).
When Windows Phones launched, reviews were outstanding. They were crisp and functional, and their partnerships made for quality, reliable hardware that somehow didn’t cost a mortgage to buy. Everyone had that one friend with a Windows phone, and they were pretty happy. But the single biggest problem was the lack of apps.
Not for want of trying, either: Microsoft pumped out enormous incentives for developers who wrote apps for their phones. In some cases, they handed checks of up to $100,000 simply to get them to port popular apps to their platform. It worked a little, but even if these apps were popular, they couldn’t give users the swarms of options they had with Android or iOS.
The irony is unbelievable, considering Microsoft’s own developer tools are widely used to write the apps that would appear on every mobile platform but their own. But they were just too late to the game. Developers weren’t willing to devote resources away from the leading platforms just to help Microsoft play catch-up. And Slack’s actions guarantee that same fate for future competitors.
What Slack is doing by courting us is creating a permanent feedback loop: they get more apps for their platform straight out of the gate, which makes their service even more attractive for users. As user counts rise, more developers look at Slack and see dollar signs, and hop in to create yet more added value. This hooks more users, hooks more developers, users, developers, and so on.
  By this point, Slack doesn’t even need a superior service to dominate the market. The size of the app ecosystem versus a newcomer’s becomes so stark that anyone who tries to compete against Big Slack and its Army of Fleas will quickly go the way of the Windows Phone.
  This, mind you, is not the only way Slack looks forward with its ecosystem. Its API, while quite reasonably open, was also designed specifically with bots in mind. All the necessary calls you need to write a Slack bot are simple and well-documented. They’re not just sowing seeds, but the right seeds. What apps are to mobile, bots may very well be to Slack.
  In fact, their investment in the proper API calls pales in comparison to the resources Microsoft and Facebook have committed to supporting bot development. But it’s very efficient. When a developer chooses a platform, they have to examine a very large plot to find if it’s a good fit. How much control does the platform assert or claim? Can I stray from their standards and have the bot still work? What’s the pricing model? The user base? Their legal attitudes? Their developer relations ethos? Slack has done such a good job at removing obstacles across the board that it’s an attractive place to build a bot without the company needing to write multi-million dollar supporting framework in an unproven industry.
Yes, there are plenty of good elephants in the herd. With all the different means of communications out there, we will put MailClark on a plethora of platforms eventually. But as us third-parties grow, we’re happy to charge into the world together: We get a big brother, and Slack gets a big stick.

下一篇:Krebs Warns Source Code Leaked From Massive IoT Botnet Attack

xjhaozhiyong 发表于 2016-10-3 10:49:34
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

喜哥 发表于 2016-10-3 10:58:43
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

德小隆 发表于 2016-10-3 12:03:54
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

涼涼的依賴感 发表于 2016-10-3 18:08:17
意料之中是戏, 意外之中是计
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

南风知我意 发表于 2016-10-3 20:13:27
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

●lL勇・ 发表于 2016-10-10 12:28:47
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

烟半 发表于 2016-11-5 08:09:45
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

a7112595a 发表于 2016-11-6 07:56:43
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

得意的笑 发表于 2016-11-11 07:32:41
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册




扫码访问 @iTTTTT瑞翔 的微博
手机版/ ( 粤ICP备05003221号 | 文网文[2010]257号 )|网站地图 酷辣虫

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc. Design: Dean. DiscuzFans.

返回顶部 返回列表