您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？立即注册
US officially reduces its internet oversight
The handover follows an unsuccessful last-minute attempt by four states' Republican attorneys general toblock the transition. A federal judge shot down their temporary injunction request, which centered around the notion that the US was "giving away government property" and required Congressional approval to give up ICANN. The attorneys echoed their party's worry that reducing US control would open the internet to greater censorship by countries like China and Russia. They were also concerned that the shift could threaten US government domains like .gov and .mil.
Proponents of the transition argue that the move is not only harmless, but might avert a far worse outcome. They say that censorship-heavy countries don't have any more power over the internet than they did before, especially since ICANN will still operate out of Los Angeles. If anything, a privately-managed domain system reduces the pressure to relinquish control to the United Nations, where China and Russia would have some influence. There's also a fear that continued American oversight would encourage countries to set up their own domain systems and fragment the internet.
In practice? Barring surprises, you shouldn't notice a difference at all. The NTIA did little more than rubber-stamp ICANN's actions -- this is more of a formality than a practical change, at least in the near term. It's an acknowledgment that the internet has been decentralized for decades, and that no one country has a claim to it.