职场创业

    今日:270| 主题:45112
收藏本版
IT、互联网、电子商务创业经验、建议、管理等知识分享。

[其他] Why ad mediation needs disrupting

[复制链接]
蹲街角只为等待伱 发表于 2016-10-1 06:17:05
139 8

立即注册CoLaBug.com会员,免费获得投稿人的专业资料,享用更多功能,玩转个人品牌!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x

Why ad mediation needs disrupting-1 (ad,mediation,disrupting,mediation,mediation,analysis,moderated,mediation)

  Mobile ad tech has evolved rapidly in recent years. As advertiser spend has increased greatly, there has been a correspondingly huge growth in tools and platforms to help app publishers earn as much revenue as possible through their in-app advertising.
  One of the hottest topics in ad monetization right now is mediation. In principle, mediation is a wonderful thing for app publishers. It enables you to aggregate demand from different networks, making each demand source compete for your available impressions. The increase in demand leads to higher competition which, in turn, results in better fill rates and eCPMs (effective cost per thousand impressions) and, ultimately, ad revenue.
  Mediation may sound like a perfect solution to managing your ad waterfall but, in reality, the industry is riddled with problems. This is highlighted by the fact there is very little loyalty between large publishers and their mediation platform, with many working on annual contracts that are instigated by six-figure integration bonuses.
  So, what are the biggest problems which underpin the industry, and how can this part of the ad tech ecosystem be changed for the better?
  Most mediation is not real time

  The technology used by the majority of platforms today is still very much in its infancy. Many mediation solutions claim to make decisions in real time by looking at bids from each demand source and selecting the highest bid for that specific impression. However, this isn’t strictly true for large volumes of demand.
  Most ad networks do not provide bid data to mediation platforms. In order for a mediation company to decide which network they deem to be the highest paying, they must use historical data provided via reporting APIs. The problem here is that data within the reporting APIs can be up to 48 hours old and contain aggregated information. It’s certainly not a real-time environment where each network bids against one another for each impression.
  While the above is true for a huge volume of demand accessed through mediation platforms today, publishers can access real-time bids for their inventory if the mediation platform is connected to a DSP (demand-side platform). However, mediation platforms need to be much clearer about how their platforms actually work and avoid using misleading marketing material to describe how a publisher’s ad waterfall is managed.
  Many platforms are biased

  Make no mistake, making money as a mediation platform is tough. One of the most popular ways mediation platforms earn money is by injecting their own demand into a publisher’s waterfall, which is usually compulsory. In effect, the mediation platform takes a percentage of a publisher’s impressions and sells this to advertisers directly. The publisher then earns a commission from this sold inventory, just as they do from other ad networks. Because of this, many mediation platforms market themselves as “free.” This is very misleading, and here’s why.
  Broadly speaking, it’s easy to check if a mediation platform’s own demand is being allocated the correct volume of impressions, as it is visible in their reporting. However, the more important question to ask is, which impressions have the mediation platform taken?
  Not every impression in your app has the same value. For example, the first impression in your waterfall is going to earn you more than your tenth impression. So, while a mediation platform may only have taken 5 percent of your impressions, if all these impressions were the first impression, then their performance will look stronger than it actually is, and you will likely have lost revenue due to your most valuable inventory being made non-competitive.
  Some platforms have got to be more transparent about this side of their business and provide reporting that clearly highlights which demand is getting access to which impressions. Ultimately, by having their own demand in the mix, mediation platforms have a conflict of interest. To what extent do they optimize their own revenue versus yours?
  Hidden commissions

  One thing that many mediation platforms don’t disclose is the fact they make money from most of their demand partners. For example, if a mediation platform is integrated with demand source A, B, and C, they will likely be taking varying amounts of advertiser commission from each, typically ranging between 3 percent and 6 percent of overall earnings.
  Do you trust that this doesn’t affect their weighting on what appears within your waterfall? If ad network A pays out a much better commission than ad network B, which will receive more exposure?
  The fact is, most mediation partners need to take a commission from their demand partners, as margins are already tight. But this needs to be documented and explained to publishers.
   With the above said, as with all areas of ad tech, improvements are being made at a rapid rate, and this is something that Christian Calderon, chief revenue officer at Ketchapp , is excited about. He told me:
  “Mediation is good and here to stay, the increased competition in the marketplace is forcing providers to improve their technology and service, and we think over the next six to 12 months publishers are going to see some exciting developments in the space.”
  For the foreseeable future, though, publishers need to be aware of exactly how their chosen platform works, and how they make their money.

Why ad mediation needs disrupting-2 (ad,mediation,disrupting,mediation,mediation,analysis,moderated,mediation)
Dom Bracher is cofounder and CPO at Tapdaq , a platform that enables mobile developers to grow and monetize their apps with powerful cross-promotion and unbiased ad mediation.
友荐云推荐




上一篇:Why this prominent New York investor is funding a startup that could eat into hi
下一篇:Honest Co. is reformulating its soaps after ingredients controversy
酷辣虫提示酷辣虫禁止发表任何与中华人民共和国法律有抵触的内容!所有内容由用户发布,并不代表酷辣虫的观点,酷辣虫无法对用户发布内容真实性提供任何的保证,请自行验证并承担风险与后果。如您有版权、违规等问题,请通过"联系我们"或"违规举报"告知我们处理。

迎松 发表于 2016-10-1 06:22:50
人生如戏,全靠演技。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

杜俊杰 发表于 2016-10-1 06:38:54
老鼠扛刀,满街找猫!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

敷衍式℡活下去 发表于 2016-10-1 06:46:03
这么好的贴,家里人知道吗
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

流星雨又来临 发表于 2016-10-1 06:46:36
火前留名,前排占座,此楼出租,欢迎议价。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

ztunwen 发表于 2016-10-1 11:54:30
吾生也有涯,而吃也无涯.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

吃货总比痴货好 发表于 2016-10-1 17:13:06
楼主,涨姿势呃。。。。。。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

rtpot 发表于 2016-10-1 19:12:56
好贴,好贴,必须顶一个!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

dlbg199 发表于 2016-10-1 20:23:19
前排顶,很好!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

*滑动验证:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

我要投稿

推荐阅读

扫码访问 @iTTTTT瑞翔 的微博
回页顶回复上一篇下一篇回列表手机版
手机版/CoLaBug.com ( 粤ICP备05003221号 | 文网文[2010]257号 )|网站地图 酷辣虫

© 2001-2016 Comsenz Inc. Design: Dean. DiscuzFans.

返回顶部 返回列表